Performance analysis of EIM (Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Fund)
Annual Return
Over the past 3 years, EIM has had an average annual return of +5.67%, underperforming the benchmark SPY, which returned +22.45% annual.
Over the past 5 years, EIM has had an average annual return of -1.37%, underperforming the benchmark SPY, which returned +13.88% annual.
Over the past 10 years, EIM has had an average annual return of +1.57%, underperforming the benchmark SPY, which returned +15.45% annual.
Since Aug 28, 2002, EIM has had an average annual return of +4.36%, underperforming the benchmark SPY, which returned +11.27% annual.
| 2026 | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +3.55% | -0.09% | +8.21% | +1.67% | -19.81% | +4.34% | +10.56% | +18.91% | -5.30% | +6.45% | +0.77% | +7.48% |
| 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 |
| +20.80% | -14.03% | +16.83% | +19.25% | -0.68% | +50.22% | -33.00% | -4.45% | +11.59% | +24.74% | +4.38% | +10.55% |
| 2002 | |||||||||||
| -8.99% |
Monthly Return
| Year | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Annually Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +2.58% | +1.62% | -2.19% | +2.06% | +0.01% | -0.51% | +3.55% | ||||||
| 2025 | -1.15% | +1.58% | -2.71% | -2.29% | -0.00392% | +0.85% | -0.40% | +3.05% | +1.73% | +0.72% | +0.31% | -1.60% | -0.09% |
| 2024 | +0.67% | +2.73% | +0.16% | -3.51% | +4.09% | +3.17% | -1.31% | +1.35% | +3.16% | -2.22% | +2.89% | -2.88% | +8.21% |
| 2023 | +1.78% | -5.07% | +4.68% | -0.62% | -3.83% | +1.17% | +0.74% | -3.57% | -6.33% | -0.52% | +9.95% | +4.45% | +1.67% |
| 2022 | -7.44% | -1.60% | -5.90% | -6.05% | +3.98% | -3.57% | +3.95% | -4.06% | -8.22% | -2.02% | +9.59% | +1.03% | -19.81% |
| 2021 | -1.18% | -1.43% | +1.52% | +1.58% | +1.64% | +0.73% | +1.68% | +0.07% | -2.83% | -0.16% | +1.58% | +1.18% | +4.34% |
| 2020 | +2.20% | +0.53% | -4.56% | -3.58% | +7.09% | -0.15% | +4.48% | -1.18% | +1.42% | -0.99% | +2.23% | +3.18% | +10.56% |
| 2019 | +3.93% | +0.62% | +6.18% | +0.67% | +1.23% | -0.61% | +3.16% | +2.61% | -0.51% | -0.82% | +0.41% | +0.80% | +18.91% |
| 2018 | -3.35% | -1.68% | +0.66% | -0.87% | +2.39% | -0.35% | -0.02% | +0.83% | -1.99% | -4.30% | +2.04% | +1.46% | -5.30% |
| 2017 | +2.78% | -0.83% | +0.96% | +0.67% | +1.45% | +0.25% | +1.59% | +0.64% | -1.08% | -0.62% | +0.25% | +0.26% | +6.45% |
Drawdown analysis of EIM (Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Fund)
The maximum drawdown for the EIM was -52.49%, occurring on Dec 15, 2008. Recovery took 364 trading sessions.
The current EIM drawdown is -9.72%.
Since Aug 28, 2002 EIM has experienced the following drawdowns:
- 50% or more: 1 time
- 40% or more: 1 time
- 30% or more: 2 times
- 20% or more: 5 times
- 10% or more: 10 times
| Depth | Start | To Bottom | Bottom | To Recover | End | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -52.49% | Jan 14, 2008 | 233 | Dec 15, 2008 | 364 | May 27, 2010 | 597 |
| -31.68% | Sep 15, 2021 | 531 | Oct 25, 2023 | Ongoing | Ongoing | Ongoing |
| -26.01% | Dec 6, 2012 | 175 | Aug 19, 2013 | 363 | Jan 28, 2015 | 538 |
| -24.04% | Feb 25, 2020 | 19 | Mar 23, 2020 | 83 | Jul 21, 2020 | 102 |
| -23.12% | Oct 4, 2010 | 72 | Jan 14, 2011 | 239 | Dec 27, 2011 | 311 |
| -15.00% | Jul 8, 2016 | 102 | Dec 1, 2016 | 613 | May 13, 2019 | 715 |
| -14.38% | Mar 18, 2004 | 36 | May 10, 2004 | 112 | Oct 19, 2004 | 148 |
| -12.21% | Sep 5, 2002 | 73 | Dec 18, 2002 | 99 | May 13, 2003 | 172 |
| -11.76% | May 3, 2007 | 73 | Aug 16, 2007 | 102 | Jan 11, 2008 | 175 |
| -10.51% | Jun 19, 2003 | 35 | Aug 8, 2003 | 107 | Jan 12, 2004 | 142 |
| -8.58% | Dec 29, 2005 | 123 | Jun 27, 2006 | 36 | Aug 17, 2006 | 159 |
| -7.84% | Jan 30, 2015 | 90 | Jun 10, 2015 | 92 | Oct 20, 2015 | 182 |
| -7.62% | Feb 14, 2005 | 28 | Mar 28, 2005 | 27 | May 4, 2005 | 55 |
| -7.30% | Mar 5, 2012 | 9 | Mar 16, 2012 | 37 | May 9, 2012 | 46 |
| -4.71% | Oct 19, 2004 | 14 | Nov 8, 2004 | 46 | Jan 13, 2005 | 60 |
| -4.55% | Sep 26, 2005 | 16 | Oct 18, 2005 | 42 | Dec 16, 2005 | 58 |
| -4.27% | Feb 11, 2021 | 17 | Mar 9, 2021 | 32 | Apr 23, 2021 | 49 |
| -3.97% | Aug 10, 2020 | 20 | Sep 8, 2020 | 57 | Nov 27, 2020 | 77 |
| -3.89% | Jul 31, 2012 | 18 | Aug 24, 2012 | 11 | Sep 11, 2012 | 29 |
| -3.64% | Aug 21, 2019 | 18 | Sep 17, 2019 | 54 | Dec 3, 2019 | 72 |
| -3.60% | Dec 31, 2020 | 9 | Jan 14, 2021 | 16 | Feb 8, 2021 | 25 |
| -3.45% | Dec 26, 2006 | 19 | Jan 25, 2007 | 28 | Mar 7, 2007 | 47 |
| -3.19% | Nov 8, 2012 | 5 | Nov 15, 2012 | 3 | Nov 20, 2012 | 8 |
| -2.91% | Feb 13, 2012 | 3 | Feb 16, 2012 | 9 | Mar 1, 2012 | 12 |
| -2.34% | Oct 8, 2012 | 2 | Oct 10, 2012 | 9 | Oct 23, 2012 | 11 |